CAD

  Hi, I am sure that something I do not do correctly, I believe there with that condition of an=0.       Prime 10 file attached.

I've got a part with two dims that I've renamed from their original symbolic names (example: d123) to C and D.  How do I find their original dimension names if I've forgotten what they were?

When rendering images with the Render Studio package that comes with Creo 10. Bump maps, which I use all of the time to represent things like fiber wrapping on tanks, iso grid structure, weld beads, etc., are not being scaled per my inputs.  This is especially useful for representing threads. I have a basic raster image for threads that I apply to a threaded surface, and just scale it along the revolve axis as needed to represent the number of threads that should be there as a function of the cylinder length, and the thread pitch.  Thread bump maps are being rendered, but with a default scale of 1 along the rotational axis. These results are whether I use a parametric or cylindrical mapping for those textures. I don’t know if there is a setting I missed, a configuration value I overlooked, or what.

Hello, is there a method to know the file size in Mb of an assembly or part in creo or in windchill? Tank you, Michele Barile

Hello, I'm having a hard time understanding units in Mathcad. I'm trying to plot an axial capacity vs depth after integrating the Axial_cap function with different depth. It works without when i have no units, but it shows an error : "These units are not compatible". I don't understand what's the problem.

I am trying to add onto a part which opened up from an assembly. I make the thing I was trying to make but the save buttons are all greyed out. Not sure how to fix this any help would be appreciated. The model also had a validation import failure, but I just clicked ignore. Idk if that's the cause but it still won't let me save. Thanks! 

I am working on generating a imperial drawing for a part that was designed using metric standards and the Model properties use mm as the base unit. The drawing is using dual dimensioning SECONDARY to allow me to dimension in inches. However the part also has several threaded holes that have hole notes generated. This means that the hole and thread depth are using the mm from the model when bringing it into the drawing (so instead of 1in depth the note looks to appear as if it had 25.4in depth). Is there a way to make the hole note that gets pulled in to use the secondary dimensions of inches that the drawing is using so that it matches the units of the drawing without setting the model properties to inches and updating the note in the model.

Is it possible to block the System colors, Interface and Theme options in Creo Parametric (10.0.6) from unauthorized user changes through config.sup?

Dear Creo users,While doing some complicated sketch don't you think there is a need of linear and circular pattern options in creo sketch? Its true pattern option is given in solid modelling and we can pattern a feature or group of features. In solid works users can pattern inside sketch mode. in creo 3.0 and 4.0 is there any updates on sketch pattern? I am using creo 2.0.With regards,Soumya

1.どのような製品とバージョンを実行していますか?Creo Parametric 8.0.1.0 2.問題はありますか?アーティクル - CS364641にて、CreoParametric5.0以降でモデルチェックレポートのカテゴリが変更になったとあります。現在、新しいUIでのカテゴリの定義ができませんが、できるようになってほしいです。3. 回避策を使用していますか? 「はい」の場合は、それについて説明してください。config.proに「modelcheck_show_new_report_ui no」を設定すると、古いUIでのカテゴリの定義ができることは確認しましたが、新しいUIでのカテゴリ定義はできません。 4. あなたの組織のユースケースは何ですか?モデルチェックのカテゴリは、チェック内容を的確に探すために、大変有意義な機能です。複数のチェック項目を追加した場合、よりそう思います。 5. この問題は現在、あなたの組織にどのような影響を与えていますか?Creoのバージョンアップ時に機能が損なわれました。 本機能の改修についてご検討のほど、よろしくお願いいたします。

Hey folks!Need a bit of help...So I’ve got this huge assembly in Creo that takes forever to open — like 30-40 mins easily. When I peeked into the task manager, I noticed it’s only using a single CPU core, even though the machines/workstations have quad-core and some even octa-core processors. Is this normal for Creo? Or is there some any setting or config tweak I may be missing that can make it use all cores and speed things up?Many thanks in advance.Ciao,Srikar

Hi,I am adding a decal to my part, and as suggested in this ticket, I used the flip decal buttons to correctly align my image. Solved: Invert/Mirror Decal Appearence - PTC Community However, when I go to render my part, the image is "unflipped". When I get out of the render application and back to the modeler, the decal is in the correct orientation.  Any thoughts on what can be happening here?  Example decal on the part, as seen in the model view Same decal in the render view  Thanks!

I am using Creo Parametric Release 8.0 and Datecode8.0.9.0Cannot login in https://app.ar-design.ptc.io. My credentials are correct,Contents of std.err: AR Connection Failed: Request Timeout : Url: https://app.ar-design.ptc.io/ARPublish/creoauth/check_authenticated_access.txtHere are the errors that I facedAR Connection Failed: Request Timeout : Url: https://app.ar-design.ptc.io/ARPublish/creoauth/check_authenticated_access.txt

Hi PTC,I'm using creo6.0 with T1 license, I want to do modal analysis but the function seems unable, the button is gray. My GPU is nvidia quadro p2000 and I have already updated the driver. Please give me some advises, thank you!  

Provide a trial license file or give instructions to activate the software without a key

Hello,I am using Mathcad Prime Release 11.0 and Datecode11.0.0.0Regarding the page number format, is there a way to start page numbering with a number other than "1"?If not, is it possible to manually insert the page numbers into the header of each page?

In PTC Mathcad Prime 10.0.0.0 I am using an if else statement where I am comparing two variables, qu and qt with the same units, psf. However, I am getting the error that the value must be scalar. I am trying to get a return of qu or qt depending on what their values are. I would appreciate help in a solution for this.       

Currently all lines of the views in the drawings are the same, and only get to their required state (thickness) during export, when pen tables control how thick the lines are. I would like to remove the use of pen tables and start seeing actual thicknesses on the screen during development of the drawings. I tried playing with line thicknesses in line styles and I think I could make it work. But I only managed to change the line thickness for existing views, however any new model views still default to thin lines, regardless what I set as default line style. I might be using that default line style functionality wrongly because no matter what I do with it it doesn't seem to change anything.  Is there a way to set the styles of the lines for new views in the drawings? I would like to set the model edges to be slightly thicker than surfaces (quilts) of cosmetic threads and crosshatches in cross-sections.  I am on Creo 9. Many thanks for the help.

I'm exploring using Styles to provide simplified views of large welded sheet metal assemblies. (Eg, hide a chunk of components to show an earlier stage of assembly process, make some transparent for clarity). I'm also exploring modelling welds. Currently I have a lot of floating midair solid welds when I Blank components in different Styles. Surface welds interact as expected with Blank/Unblank, but solid welds stay visible when Blanked through the design tree or view window. (They then have the option to Unblank when selected even though they're still visible.) Checking View Manager -> Style -> Properties, they're not listed. However, if I change the display style of solid welds (eg make them transparent) they ARE listed and I can Blank them from the Properties window, which works.  I know I could just use surface welds, but I would like to have the capacity to use solid welds without this workaround. Is there something I'm missing that explains why they won't jus

I'm not sure of the best way to do this, but I know it can be done from a previous job. I would like to create a table where the user can selection options like they would in a symbol and their selections would populate the table. Basically, I'm trying to create a "Applied Standards" table where the user can pick the relevant standards from a list and put them in the table automatically.What is the best way to go about doing this? I don't really see a way to do it with repeat regions or in the symbol gallery.

For all of Mathcad's reputation as being a primary math software, it's always a little frustrating that it can't seem to replicate and utilize the math notation commonly used in textbooks, reference books, etc. Many, many references will use special characters of some type in their variable names, but this seems to be next to impossible to replicate in Mathcad worksheets, so I have to use alternate naming for those variables, and then add text noting that this variable is really the one everyone is familiar with that uses a symbol in the variable name. For instance, when referencing stresses parallel and perpendicular to the plane of interest, it's not unusual to use a term like f‖ and f┴ to denote those. (See the screenshot below for how these are were supposed to look. They looked exactly like they were supposed to when I typed them, but then I hit "post" and the editor removed the "invalid HTML" [subscripts]) Anyway, symbols like that in the variable subscripts are common, clear, re

Hello,I want to generate a txt file with two columns corresponding to the t and f(t) variables.   MP10 file attached.  

I have a working installation in an old PC, but are now bound to go over to an other PC. Installation goes ok but licensing does not work.

I had to program a long expression that runs past the width of the page.  Prime has a means of wrapping a math equation.  Is there a means to wrap an expression as shown below? TR := "Z1P OR Z1G OR Z2PT OR Z2GT OR Z4PT OR Z4GT OR 51T01 OR 87OP OR (50P1 OR 50G1 OR 67P2T OR 67G4T) AND LOP AND 87BLK"

I have a large portion of calculations that I will be calling a few times and I would like to avoid repeating it it's not a simple function f(x) = x^2, that I could just create a custom one. it has loops, etc I saw a suggestion of putting everything in a solve block, but the solve block has these options (guess, constraints, solver) that I will not be using in my routine:Also, after I defined the subroutine, how do i call the results?i am using Mathcad 9.0.0i attached the file that contains only the part I would like to be the subroutine itselfit has the Inputs, Calculations, Outputs. Should be easy to understand the general idea.