Recently active
When attempting to install Creo 9.0 with a student license, all is working well until the 'Install' button is hit. When attempting to use the install but, it simply closes the setup launcher and does nothing. It gives me no errors or anything else, just simply refuses to work, and closes the launcher.I've tried putting the files in a different directory, didnt work.I've also tried disabling all firewalls, didnt work.Post closure of the launcher a PTC folder is created in the desired location, but it not populated with anything.Any help is greatly appreciated.
Hi..Is there any setting in Creo Simulate in order to fully utilized the specification of my new workstation?Currently my new workstation is running a stress simulation and the time elapsed is almost equally same with my laptop . Below is the spec of my laptop and workstation:Laptop: Processor: 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-12800H 2.40 GHzGraphics Card: Nvidia RTX A2000Memory: 32GB New Workstation: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 64-Cores 2.70 GHzGraphics Card: Nvidia RTX A5000Memory: 256GB
I'm modeling an object that I want to add embossed/debossed text onto, in a manner similar to what's illustrated here. I want to be able to make the text easily editable, because it will serve as a label providing identifying information on the different permutations of this object. If I try to go back and edit the text in the original sketch, it breaks the offset command later in the feature tree, because the specific curves that were projected in order to define the sketched region to offset no longer exist. In the offset command, is there a way to tell Creo to project whatever closed curves exist in the original sketch, such that when the sketch is edited to include new text, the offset feature will be updated to reflect the new regions present in the sketch it's projecting from? Apologies if any of this is weirdly phrased or if this is an obvious question, I'm a beginner in Creo. Using Ver. 10.0.3.0
A change in functionality is being considered for a future release by Product Management, but no timeline can be committed to at this time. Is this the new "Product working to specification"? I have received this on the last 3 tickets I opened. Translated: Yes, we recognize this is a bug but no we are not going to do anything about it. Anyone else getting this same message back from PTC Support?
i created a layer with 2 model annotation and one datum plane in creo model if i hide that layer na the datum plane is hided but the model annotation not hided its still visible. Is there any other way to hide selected model based annotation in modeling UI? Thanks in advance Ram - Designer
So I have imported a part from Solidworks to Creo and I no longer have access to the Solidworks account. How do I check the dimensions of the part in Creo, even though it was originally saved as a Solidworks part? Thanks!
CREO 8.0.5.0. Parametic / Manufacturing / Material Removal SimulationWhen closing material removal simulation in manufacturing, CREO is crashing. In the past, I have chalked it up to be a large amount of sequences(Large programming file). But today, it has crashed more than a handful of times. And the program has only 7 sequences so it is on the smaller side. I tried to re-create the crash and not been able to do it. I have made a point to close the same way every time inside of the material removal simulation. Does anyone know what I am doing wrong? And how to fix it.
is there a recommended way to package the install of creo via intune? and is there an easier way to set the config settings? the config for schools.bat is all well and good for one PC but i need to send this to up to 30 computers
as far as I know it's a problem that exist at least since PRO-E WILDFIRE 3.still present in CREO 9. every time that I edit a view on the drawing, to rotate that view (i.e. a 3D view of the assembly or part), the planes show-up and I have to manually remove the visibility of these planes.it's happening every single time.if I toggle the visibility off then close the editing view (Drawing View) then I'll redo it again, the problem came back again; rotating the view toggle the visibility of the planes back again and I have to remove manually.the problem is limited to when you use the "View Orientation > Angles" part to orientate the view.if you rotate the view with the other orientation method the problem will not appear. before asking there I tried to read articles, search on-line etc. and I can't understand if it's the cad not properly set-up or it's something that has been designed that way.maybe it's me that wasn't able to find the right search keywords?I tried also search
I'm reading the following article (https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS420647): Trying to unbend sheetmetal through Creo's C++ TOOLKIT provided example (without user interaction) results in memory access exceptions no matter what I do. Looking for alternative solutions, I've found the article above. At the end, it says I could use the following functionsProCmdSmtFlatPat()ProCmdSmtUnbend()Using Creo's interactive mode, but I can't find any reference forthis mode neither for the functions listed.Where can I find these two functions?
Dear PTC CEO and programers. Deae PROE FANSI wrote this to the PTC, but no response. Forward message>I am using PROE WF5 PRO/nc as cad/cam system CAD is OK I like it. BUT!!! CAM-PRO/NC is not a CAM. When you make something new it is 80% buttons an menus, but engine is the same all the time.You are making olny small changes. Your "CAM" can not compute toolpaths on backround (multitasking)It is not using multiple core technology, I am siting on my chair an waiting for hours. (I have XEON64bit 8GB RAM HP Z400) So wake up PTC. You have a lot of bugs in your "CAM" I am not your employe tester. Bugs are in re-rough, Rough, Finishing, Profile, local mill and surface steps. There are bugs and engine is not good too. I am using EDGECAM too. If you will sleep, I will throw proe away.(to the recycle bin) Sorry for my english. It is bad, but it is better then then your "CAM" You have two options 1.new engine for PRO/NC 2.integrate pro/toolmaker in pro/nc Bukaj
I’ve written a program that monitors Creo and logs the activity in the software. It’s not like a trail file, but similar in that it uses plain easy to understand text to log software operations. It tracks all the various features and functions including save, undo, cancel, errors, and it even warns of mistakes like weak dimensions and other bad habits. It can document modeling operations in real time. Let me know if you’re interested in trying it. At the end of a days modeling session you can copy and paste this output to produce a report like this: Creo Session Summary ReportThis report consolidates the analysis of a Creo session, including the most used features, a breakdown of mouse usage, and potential areas for improvement based on the data. Report: Most Used Creo FeaturesBased on the analysis, the following Creo features were utilized most frequently: Redefining a FeatureOccurrences: 103 timesDescription: This feature was used extensively for modify
Hello all,I'm encountering an issue while converting numerous DXF files to PDF format using a Creo Mapkey. The generated PDF automatically opens in another application, interrupting the Mapkey process. This behavior persists even after changing the default PDF application. Any alternative suggestion to avoid this will be much helpful.
When I add an inspection circle to some dimensions, the dimension line extends more than required. In the following figure, this condition is shown, could anyone help me adjust it (PTC Creo 2)?
Hi All! My creo is creo Parametric 10.0.3. How does the wfcAssemblyExpressionRule works ? Can not find any details. Situation goes like: There is a part with given parameter like YEAR with value 2012. Part is child of "activeAssembly" After calling ListComponentsByAssemblyRule with expression "YEAR==2012" I got something in message window like : WARNING: Symbol '�䋐ȃ' not found in model XXXXXXXX. Retrieving submodels. where '�䋐ȃ' is totally random and varies form run to another. LogTrace shows that everything is ok with expression string and model. String is std::string passed by copy to local function. Result is always empty. Here are lines of code xstringsequence_ptr stringSeq = xstringsequence::create(); stringSeq->append(expression.c_str()); const auto rule = wfcAssemblyExpressionRule::Create(stringSeq); &n
We are experiencing an issue with borrowed licenses. We installed Creo 10.0.3.0 (we also run Creo 7.0.4.0) and since the Creo 10 install, Creo 7 will only run when connected to the network, and will not run from a borrowed license. We appear to be correctly borrowing a license using the ptcborrow.bat in "C:\Program Files\PTC\Creo 10.0.3.0\Parametric\bin" folder. Creo 10 will run from the borrowed license, but Creo 7 will not run. We receive the following error... License WarningLicense request failed for featureRequesting PROE_DesignAdvP...FLBCache: (-1) Cannot find License file.-96: Cannot connect to license server.Run ptcstatus.bat for server status. APX failed to load. IPX failed to load. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you
Hello, I am trying to perform operation on a part in an assembly using Creo toolkit. I want to know if there is a method first to activate the part in assembly then perform operation on feature present in that part. I want to perform operation like importing features or setting the parameter value in the part. TIA
Check out this video on Creo "Resolving Geometry Issues" from PTC Application EngineersPresenters: Mark DeCraene (Solution Consultant) and Ryan Butcher (Solution Consultant, Fellow)Original Date Presented: July 23, 2024
I'm experiencing significant issues connecting Creo Parametric with Visual Studio. Currently, I'm referring to the "Creo Object Toolkit C++ Release Notes" for guidance, but I'm encountering numerous errors. Could you provide a step-by-step guide on how to properly connect Creo and Visual Studio?Thank you.
Hello, I am having an issue resolving a "unitless value assignment for symbol 'D22' error. I am using Creo 7. The part is a helical sweep to create a spring. The pitch of the spring is defined using parameters. The pitch is a calculated value from the parameter "LENGTH" and "NUMBER_OF_TURNS". I have applied units in the parameters window to "LENGTH", but it has not resolved the error. I have also tried defining the dimension directly in the relations window, but that also does not resolve the issue. Any ideas as to why this might be? Thank you,John
It would be good if you could change the orientation in the Edit reference table window
Hi all hopefully a simple question, but i cant seem to find the answer.i have a simple contact static analysis setup to analyse the contact forces and stress in my designed snap fits on a plastic part retaining a pcb.it is my understanding that i should use the include snap through option in this analysis because running it without it and 10 equally spaced time steps throws a warning about excessive sliding at timestep 7, and causes it to run indefinitely seemingly*** Warning: Excessive displacement detected at contact regions. Recovery will be attempted by reducing time step size. Better convergence of the nonlinear solution may be achieved if you redefine your analysis with smaller time steps .** Warning: Complete sliding was detected at one or more contacts in your model. This can cause excessive motion and/or poor convergence. P
I am trying to find a list of the special characters that are actually supported for notes in Creo (i.e. they don't appear as an empty box in the note). There are many times where I need to flag parts in a drawing with a special character like "▼" or "★". The problem is Creo doesn't seem to fully support ASCII, HTML, or Unicode character sets so the only way to find the characters that work is by trial and error. Does anyone know of a complete list of the charters that will actual render in a note?
Hi I'm missing lines on my 2d drawing. Is it possible to "update" all views
I am working on cap and housing snap fit. I want to increase the length of the cap by 20mm. With this change, I want to have a robust fit between cap and housing with a consideration that the removal force is less than 25N. Does increasing the number of highlighted feature in the first image from 2 to 3 help? Any other suggestions are welcome. I am attaching the cap and housing files with a hope to get help from the community.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.