CAD

Hello everyone! Is there a way for select only a portion on a line? For example I want to select one portion of the line with one style and another portion of the same line with a different style. For now i can only select the whole line. In the screenshot i want the part in violet to be a different style from the green one part. Creo allow me to only select the whole line. I found this Advanced Selection Functions  but i can't find this menu, can you please tell me how i can activate it? As always thank you 

Hello,I'm currently working on Creo3.I have a licence file for Creo7 (permanent) that I need for a new client.I d'ont have subscription anymore.When I'm trying to add this licence file (txt) while installing Creo7, installer seems to freeze.File is for my computer.Should I remove my previous licence ?But I'm afraid to can not be able to work...Thanks 

Hi, I'm not able to show a component placement dimension (distance constraint) on an assembly drawing in Creo Parametric 10.  Would anyone know what config option needs to be changed or what I need to do to allow dimensions related to component placement to be shown?  I'm able to show dimension for feature internal to the part only. Thanks for any help you may provide,Don A

Dear community, Can someone help me solve the integral of the following equation in Mathcad 7.0.0.0? Only J(x) and tau(x) vary with x, and the rest are constants.Thanks in advance

I can't get a 72-hour activation key for Creo Elements Modelling Express (6) any more , I get a "Cloudflare Internal Error" (Error 500) I've tried re-installing Creo and re-installing Windows (8.1 on a Macbook Pro Bootcamp) but no joy. It was working fine a while ago but I read that they have upgraded their security, maybe that's the cause. I've emptied cache. and tried different browsers. Is there a way to bypass cloudflare?

I am having trouble with the scaling on flat-to-screen annotations when publishing a .pvz from Creo for viewing in Creo view. Previously I was using Creo parametric 7, and the flat-to-screen annotations would show up approximately the size in the screen window as I had it set in Creo.  After upgrading to Creo 10, the flat-to-screen annotations shrink and move on publishing. Is there a recipe file setting I can use to get them to scale properly?  Creo Parametric 10.0.8.0Creo View 10.1

There are a plethora of discussions on converting real numbers to strings.  While PTC tech support does provide two working suggestions, they are not simple.  Beyond that, I have been unable to find anything on the PTC Community that will work in all cases.  (See list at bottom.)  With that as the background, here is my attempt at a robust real-to-string function that I believe works correctly for all positive numbers.  Please test this out and let me know if you can find any errors with it.   /* Real NumberX = 12.34567 /* Number of DigitsND = 3 /* Rounded NumberRN = FLOOR((X+(5/10^(ND+1))),ND) /* String Output - No Leading ZeroY = ITOS(FLOOR(RN))+"."+EXTRACT(ITOS((RN-FLOOR(RN)+1)*10^(ND)),2,ND)   * To get a zero before the decimal point for values less than one, a conditional statement is required:   /* String Output With Leading Zero IF FLOOR(RN) == 0     Y = "0."+EXTRACT(ITOS((RN-FLOOR(RN)+1)*10^(ND)),2,ND) ELSE   &nbs

Dear ptc community, I am trying to plot a solved parameter of nonlinear equations (J) vs x (a variable that can range from 0 to 0.5. I have tried to plot it, but I got only a point rather than a continuous line plot. Can you please help me with it? I have attached my Mathcad  (7.0.0.0) file for your reference.Thanks in advance.Kind regards,Tadele

This is an annoying fringe issue. But I have tables with notes (notes have two lines of string values) and sometimes when I update a string value the note doesn't update in the BOM automatically. Nor does it update when I update tables. It seems to only update when I go to modelling and make sure it's regenerated and go to annotations click on the note and look at the text in text editor and then update tables.  Does anyone have any ideas how to fix this? Maybe next time it happens I'll check whether it prints the correct info and creo is just showing the old info.

I have an old version of Wildfire 5 still running on a very old laptop. I would like to install the software on my new laptop as the oridgal laptop is on its last legs. But because I am no longer on maintenance this appears to be impossible. Login to my account then go to support and I am hit the same stone wall, you are not on maintenance. You cannot proceed bla bla bla. Is there a solution? Please help.

Draftsmen have two Screen, how to proceed to display Creo in only one window ? (a extended mode) Thanks for your help Best regards

Dear Team,We operate in an environment where several industries use Creo Parametric for the creation and editing of appearances applied to parts and wires. We are currently using Creo Parametric version 12.0.2.0.We would like to suggest an improvement related to the organization of custom appearances. Currently, all created appearances are grouped under the “My Appearance” tab, which mixes appearances intended for wires, solid models, and sheet metal. This limitation directly affects organization and workflow efficiency.Our suggestion is to allow the creation of new custom tabs or categories within the Appearance Manager, enabling users to separate appearances by application type (wires, solids, sheet metal, among others).This functionality would significantly improve ease of use when creating and editing appearances, as well as provide better color organization. As a direct result, it would also help reduce design time, leading to increased productivity and cost savings for companies.

Pro/Toolkit link error: “unresolved external symbol ProDimensionBaselineDirectionGet” — which library to link, and how to map APIs to libs?I’m building a Creo Parametric Pro/Toolkit application and I’m hitting a linker error when calling ProDimensionBaselineDirectionGet().Error : unresolved external symbol ProDimensionBaselineDirectionGet referenced in DIMVisitAction(...) — LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals.Already added libraries : protoolkit_NU.lib, pt_asynchronous.lib, ucore.lib, udata.lib, kernel32.lib, user32.lib, wsock32.lib, advapi32.lib, mpr.lib, winspool.lib, netapi32.lib, psapi.lib, gdi32.lib, shell32.lib, comdlg32.lib, ole32.lib, ws2_32.lib.Questions:Which specific Toolkit library contains ProDimensionBaselineDirectionGet()?What’s the recommended way to determine the required library for any given Pro/Toolkit API (e.g., doc index, API Wizard mapping, or dumpbin on .lib files)?Thanks in advance for your support!!

Bonjour,J'aurais besoin de télécharger le flexnet pour gérer la licence Mathcad.Cordialement

Hi there! I want to get one value interpolated from the parameter, obtained from the calculation routine.The goal is to perform interpolation of the curvature value Curvature (Alef, the second output's result) as a function of the bending moment value (Moment, the first output's result) from the given value of M_fact. By using the "linterp" function, I got stuck with the error message:"The elements in this vector must be in ascending order". After reviewing the relevant topic on the PTC forum, the only possible solution was to start the list of matrices at 1, yet my attempt to set ORIGIN:=1 hadn't worked. I use the Prime 10.0.0 version of the software. The file with the problem is attached. I'd be very appreciative of any assistance and advice regarding the issue. 

Hi, i hope to be in the right place for my question.I'm playing with Creo Live and i'm doing some CFD analisys on a mecnanical structure, i've manged to have the simulation running (it's similar to the wind tunnel example file).I was trying to get the total forces on a body or a set of surfaces but i have zero cluse on how to setup a measurent.Any help is wellcome.

The Bad Idea Fairy was drunkenly wandering through my brain, stomping down the grass with his size 13 boots, singing off-key, scaring the squirrels, and littering the place with ... well, bad ideas.   However, whilst I was pretending to tidy up, I looked at one of those ideas and thought, "Hmm. Maybe he'd stolen that one from his twin brother, the Good Idea Fairy (you can't tell them apart, sometimes)?".   The idea? "Now that Mathcad 11 has introduced Python Scripting, maybe it's time to introduce a Mathcad equivalent of PEP 20?".   Instead of proposing a "Feature Request" or reporting a suspected bug, perhaps we could introduce an MEP (Mathcad Enhancement Proposal)?   Starting with:   MEP 00 – The Zen of Mathcad   1. >>> Range Variables Are Not Vectors <<<.2. Think in two dimensions for layout and data.3. Be like Zathras-- cover all possibilities. Zathras does not want other people being confoosed.4. Yesterday's friendly hard limits

Hi all,I'm working in Creo Parametric Mechanism to model a pinion and crown gear assembly with axial/radial offset between their axes. This is not a standard intersecting-bevel gear setup — the pinion and crown gear must mesh with a deliberate offset between their axes.However, when I attempt to apply the built-in Bevel Gear Connection, Creo throws: "The references for bevel gear connection are not coplanar”.How can I simulate bevel gear kinematics when the pinion and crown gears are offset (i.e., non-coplanar axes)? 

I need to retrieve the X, Y, Z, and C offsets of all components in an assembly relative to the main part’s coordinate system. Ideally, I’d like to export these values into an external file (CSV or TXT).Is there a built-in method or mapkey/API/Toolkit solution to automate this?

Hello,Would it be possible to request an enhancement to ModelCheck?Specifically, I would like ModelCheck to be able to verify the Bend Allowance settings. For example, I would like to check that for sheetmetal parts, the “Bend allowance driven by” option is correctly set to be driven by the material.Even further, I would like to validate that the Sheetmetal Preferences are consistent with the smtdsnsetup.smd configuration file.Thank you in advance if this request could be considered.Adrien Blazy  

I'm using MathCAD Prime 9.0.0.0. MathCAD is always forcing Units of Measure. Usually it'll choose appropriately based on the data going into it. However, sometimes it's wrong or uses weird units and won't allow me to override. A work around is I can not use units at all or I can put in a 2nd equation without units, but I shouldn't have to do that. One of the advantages to MathCAD is I can use multiple units in the same equation and MathCAD knows the difference. In this case...I want......but I get...I want......but I get... Thanks,      Brent

"Problem. A Poisson stream of requests arrives at a single-channel queuing system with loss. The time between the arrivals of two consecutive requests is distributed according to the law  the service time of requests is random and distributed according to the lawFind using the Monte Carlo method over a time period T=30 min: a) the number of served requests; b) the average service time of one request." If possible, please provide screenshots of the solution to the problem using Mathcad so that I can understand and clarify the essence of the solution..  

To whom this may concern,  Looking for help on how to setup Matrix headers for the attached.  I would like to have a Title above each column for each variable, and the corresponding units shown in the matrix. See remarks in red within the attached.  Many thanks,Iain  FYI, I use Mathcad Prime 10.0.0.0 

 Creo+ continues to deliver new enhancements designed to accelerate your workflows and boost productivity. With over 40 new enhancements across user productivity, composites, ECAD, simulation, manufacturing and more, Creo+ 13.1 helps you to deliver your best designs in less time than ever before!Smarter Electrical Design: In Creo+ you can now build harnesses as assemblies for structured data management, component reuse, and easier collaboration in multi-user collaboration sessions.Intelligent MBD: Pattern recognition in GD&T Advisor helps to define patterns, capture design intent, and maintain associativity for faster, more accurate annotations. As your model evolves, the pattern recognition feature will adjust accordingly.Advanced Surfacing: Enjoy smoother, higher-quality surfaces with improved flexibility in control point manipulation and faster performance – even on the most complex models.Simulation Upgrades: ANSYS solvers have been upgraded to version 2025 R2 to deliver e

I am using Creo Parametric Release 12.4 and Datecode12.4.2.0Hi, our company recently installed Creo 12.4. It is now in the standar configuration (inch, pound, standard ambient, exc... ). We want to transfer the personalized configuration from the version used till today (Creo 9) to the new installed version. How can we achieve this?PS. We have also a Creo Simulation pack.