CAD

In the attached file - a collection of 100 fractals. Used IFS formulas. If you want to add a collection - you're welcome.Viktor

Could please tell us how we can open creo view for chromeos user and what are application need to install to open the

Creo Parametric version 8.0.7.0 I'm trying to create a mold for my subject and want to split the body using a plane. Which fails. Then I tried to extrude a body out of the plane I want to split, and the use boolean operation feature to either intersect or subtract the bodies. I was successful on one side, but the other side fails, which I believe the same problem it may have faced when splitting using the plane. Any advise, help is greatly appreciated. Thank you! Fails trying to split using a planeOne side successful using another body to get the intersectOther side fails trying to do the same operation.

I have some personal designs that were made using an education version and have recently purchased a commercial/personal version (Creo version 12).  I cannot open the files in the new version.  The help talks about using a converter but you have to make the conversion in the education version.  I no longer have access to the education version as I have retired.  I am using Creo for my personal use as I am a self employed farmer/rancher.  Any help is appreciated.

Hello againI have (yet another) possibly trivial question.I want to make a program loop that will add elements to an array as long as the user wants to.Is this even possible in MathCAD?In python the basic loop would look something like below (formating difficult): answer='Y'counter=0array=[]while answer=='Y':    answer=str(input("Add another? (Y/n) :"))    answer=answer.upper()    array.append(answer)print(array) This can look like this when run in Python:Add another? (Y/n) : Y Add another? (Y/n) : Y Add another? (Y/n) : n['Y', 'Y', 'N']

Since the Win11 update, the browser window remains in the background when the option “web_browser_in_separate_window yes” is selectedand can no longer be brought to the foreground by clicking on the icon in the system tray. This affects Chrome and Edge (IE)!

We have an existing part made from sheet metal.  I'm stumped whether or not it's a Creo "sheet metal" part.  I've watched some tutorials and none of them seem to be close to this use case.  I'd rather not have to make punches and dies. Also, as a sheet metal part, I can't figure out how to model to the finished dimensions without creating dummy waste material with dummy dimensions that you have to get rid of at the end of the model.  Seems like poor Creo practice. As a solid part, you could brute-force this as a single revolve feature.  It's bordering on poor practice having that many segments in the sketch.  Ideally there's a "better" way? If you try to use a thin feature instead of a solid feature, the dimensioning scheme doesn't work.  Some dimensions are to the inside surface while others are to the outside surface.  Also, I hate flexible modeling.  You should be able to do this in either as a solid part or sheet meta

I am using Creo Parametric Release 9.0 and Datecode9.0.4.0I am using IFX to load fasteners into my assembly. When I go to re-open my assembly, the fasteners are missing from the model and give errors in the model tree. Is there any configuration settings I need to make to specify a path for these fasteners?

 At our company, we're working to enhance our Creo Sheetmetal modeling practices to better support manufacturing. One idea we're exploring is adding small notches or cutouts at the ends of bend lines to help suppliers align bends more easily, without manual measurement.I've attempted to create a UDF for this purpose, but it's not as user-friendly or automated as we'd like. Ideally, we'd want Creo to automatically place these notches at the ends of each bend line during the modeling process. My questions are:Is there a built-in or recommended method in Creo Sheetmetal to automate the placement of such notches?Can bend line geometry be accessed or referenced to allow for automatic notch placement?

Hi, I'm struggling with a function within a solve block that requires two inputs, a force and an angle as shown below So when I evaluate R3(F1a,_delta_) I get the error that it must be a 3 element vector. I'm pretty sure my mistake is simple, but I just can not work it out.  Any help will be greatly appreciated Shane 

I have been trying to activate license but it is saying License request failed invalid host

我用映射键偏移时，偏移自动为1.0起步，用柔性建模移动，用的是系统自带的快捷键，然后再手动拖动方向-输出尺寸，但是拖动的起步也是1.0，我知道这是我配置文件的问题，因为我不用我的配置文件就不会出现这种情况。这个配置文件已经用了很多年，也可能不是配置中设置的，这个设置是其中的哪一项我不记得了。请问有没有人清楚这个问题的所在？（我现在想把1.0改为0.1起，应该修改哪里）

Im running in Creo 10.0.3.0 and am having an issue getting usable code to post. My manufacturing assembly is generating toolpaths and everything simulates correctly. I am able to generate and save a CL file, no problem. When I go to 'Post a CL File', I choose the CL that was made, and select uncx01.p11 from the PP menu. We are using Haas VF4 mills and although this post is labeled for VF8 mills, we have had other engineers post code without issue in the past. The problem is nobody recalls what(if any) additional setup needed to be done. After I choose my post, I get a command prompt window displaying "NCL record= 200 ENTER PROGRAM NUMBER" I enter a short number like 0001 and I get the following log file: Log FileNC-GPOST Mill, Version 6.8 P-20.0, Copyright(c) 2020Build number=0279Date=08-19-2025 Time=09:54:02Input File=op010_FILE_mill.ncl.1Option File=uncx01.p11Filter File=uncx01.f11*** Tape length 12.00 Cycle time 1.48 Warnings 0 ***Date=08-19-2025 Time=09:54:

I have a series of calculations that I've been doing in Prime 10 with no problem.  Now that it is opened in Prime 11, I get a plot error "These array elements must be scalar".  The plot still generates.It will not pass to a chart element and work.See attached document and data file.  Any ideas would be appreciated. Bob Adams 

I need new drawings to automatically show our standard tolerance block (by decimal places) in the title block. We work in millimeters most of the time. I’ve set the drawing_setup_file in config.pro to point to our DTL, added tol_display yes and the linear_tol values there, and confirmed the drawing format note uses the correct system parameters (e.g., linear_tol_0.0 (text config files) →&linear_tol_0_0 (drawing), etc.). I've restarted Creo and the machine. Still, when creating new parts and drawings, the tolerances in the block don’t match what’s in the DTL/config. See my attached pictures for reference.I’ve checked community threads like the one below, hence the edits I've made so far, but it doesn't work so I’m clearly missing something. https://community.ptc.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/how-to-change-default-tolerance-value-in-drawing/td-p/299696 Looking for the correct way to make this stick for all new drawings without m

I am getting error for programming could someone please help 

I have a number of relations based udfs for creating manifold block designs. All the logic is built using Relations in Creo-Parametric. There is a specific logic I have built around transferring dimensions in decimal form (say 3 decimal places) to a 3D hole-note written with relations, so that the hole note shows the 3 decimal places. (Usually, when transferring to string form, Relations only transfers the integer part of the dimension) I have a work around for this, which works well, but then, every such hole, has to have the logic built in its relations.  Is it possible to have this common logic as a subroutine, written in the part relations , which I can access, every time I want to increase the decimal places ? I can call this subroutine with the value, number of places I want to show so that the sub-routines returns a string value with the correct decimal places. This is the relations program for a counter bore dia with 2 decimal spaces and a counter bore depth with

Hi, I am currently trying to model a surfboard fin using a fin outline I found online and with an MH32 airfoil profile. I used points to make a datum curve for references to the boundary blend I made.I want to check that this geometry is okay or not as visually I can see at the top of the fin there looks like a misconnection between either blend surfaces, but I can't tell if it is just visual. I used mesh surface to see it looked weirdly shaped at the top and using the reflection you can see it reflect on the top too. Is there any way to fix this if this is the case, or is there a different way to do it with an asymmetric foil shape?Thank you,Joel 

I'm using Creo 12.4.0 When changing the "circ_interpolation" factor, arc_only seems to be broken: "Points Only" simulation does the cut correctly: "Arc only" simulation only does the lead-in and lead-out:This is for a trajectory toolpath.  But it also applies to thread milling.  The "Arc Only" path cuts the lead-in/lead-out only and doesn't cut around the part like it should.  Both appear correct in the toolpath display, but on the simulation (and in real life) the paths are broken. Toolpath Display for either setting: Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?  The workaround is to choose "points only", but this makes really huge gcode files.  And if I forget to change the setting, it can crash the tools.  

Anyone have success pointing Mathcad to the Anacona3 installation directory?   I have Anaconda Python.  Root environment is v3.11, but I have a personal v3.8 environment.  Both are supported by Mathcad Prime 11 for Advanced Controls.  My installation for Anaconda 3 is at:   C:\ProgramData\Anaconda3    Note: Anaconda doesn't like paths with spaces, so it installs in C:\ProgramData by default.  This directory contains python.exe, python3.dll and python311.dll.   I think this is the correct "Python installation folder" that I have set in Options.   I pointed the Mathcad Options item for the Python path to this directory.   Restarted Mathcad Prime 11.  It still can't find Python in my Custom Control script editor. Hopefully, someone out there has gotten this to work and can shed some light.

Dear Community I am using Creo 8.0.8.0. I would like to export or extract simulation results in a easy way into a csv-file or other file format that can be imported into excel. Currently I am facing following problem. I have done a Contact Analysis using 2 time step and I also wrote.In the post processing I created a graph using a measure (force) vs. time. Somehow I cannot export the graph. Also I cannot plot two measures (e.g. bolt force vs. input force) that shows their correlation over each time step. Somehow Creo creates several output-files and also folder of each time step but I am not able to find how to use this file and to extract the information I am interested in. Below you find a screenshot of the graph I would like to export into a CSV or other format.Within the post processing tool (Simulate Result) I was not able to export a CSV file. It was only possible to create a "rwd" file. Following I did:- Nonlinear (Contacts) simulation- Output: 6 Ma

Hello All, I am trying to simulate effect of wind load on glass railing holder which is fitted to ground via. screws. so after defining the constraints , contacts and loads when I review the results I observe that the glass holder penetrates into the ground. see attached screenshot.Can you please advise why is it so and how can it be resolved? I would appreciate your help with it.

It will be very helpfull to have ability to influence by check-box additional functionality in roun feature:- add side influence- piece to piece(like we already have in boundary blend feature) for example it is like this at the moment:but when both as suggested properties will be possible to get the result should be like this: 

Hi, Is there a way to rotate the dimension text by 180°? This is what I mean:Old:Rotated 180°: I saw someone suggest to rotate the view 180° in a previous post but this does not work for me. We are currently working with Creo 10. Kind regards,Jaime

Hi everyone,I wanted to share an issue I ran into while working on stress intensity factor () calculations in Mathcad, and see if anyone has advice on how to resolve it. When I calculated , Mathcad returned results with strange units: ΔK(a0) = 6.013×10^6 lb / (ft^0.5·s^2). That term in the denominator makes no sense — stress intensity factor units should be something like ksi√in (force / length^1.5), with no time dimensions.It seems that Mathcad is treating lb as pound-mass (lbm) instead of pound-force (lbf). Because of that, it introduces extra time units through when it tries to reconcile the dimensions. This appears to be why an is showing up in the denominator. Even after trying to redefine lb as lbf in my worksheet, Mathcad still seems to carry the time unit into the result. I can’t just delete the s^2 term — it keeps reappearing.Has anyone else run into this issue where Mathcad sneaks in an term when working with fracture mechanics equations? How do you properly set up your units