CAD

I have been trying to activate license but it is saying License request failed invalid host

我用映射键偏移时，偏移自动为1.0起步，用柔性建模移动，用的是系统自带的快捷键，然后再手动拖动方向-输出尺寸，但是拖动的起步也是1.0，我知道这是我配置文件的问题，因为我不用我的配置文件就不会出现这种情况。这个配置文件已经用了很多年，也可能不是配置中设置的，这个设置是其中的哪一项我不记得了。请问有没有人清楚这个问题的所在？（我现在想把1.0改为0.1起，应该修改哪里）

Im running in Creo 10.0.3.0 and am having an issue getting usable code to post. My manufacturing assembly is generating toolpaths and everything simulates correctly. I am able to generate and save a CL file, no problem. When I go to 'Post a CL File', I choose the CL that was made, and select uncx01.p11 from the PP menu. We are using Haas VF4 mills and although this post is labeled for VF8 mills, we have had other engineers post code without issue in the past. The problem is nobody recalls what(if any) additional setup needed to be done. After I choose my post, I get a command prompt window displaying "NCL record= 200 ENTER PROGRAM NUMBER" I enter a short number like 0001 and I get the following log file: Log FileNC-GPOST Mill, Version 6.8 P-20.0, Copyright(c) 2020Build number=0279Date=08-19-2025 Time=09:54:02Input File=op010_FILE_mill.ncl.1Option File=uncx01.p11Filter File=uncx01.f11*** Tape length 12.00 Cycle time 1.48 Warnings 0 ***Date=08-19-2025 Time=09:54:

I have a series of calculations that I've been doing in Prime 10 with no problem.  Now that it is opened in Prime 11, I get a plot error "These array elements must be scalar".  The plot still generates.It will not pass to a chart element and work.See attached document and data file.  Any ideas would be appreciated. Bob Adams 

I need new drawings to automatically show our standard tolerance block (by decimal places) in the title block. We work in millimeters most of the time. I’ve set the drawing_setup_file in config.pro to point to our DTL, added tol_display yes and the linear_tol values there, and confirmed the drawing format note uses the correct system parameters (e.g., linear_tol_0.0 (text config files) →&linear_tol_0_0 (drawing), etc.). I've restarted Creo and the machine. Still, when creating new parts and drawings, the tolerances in the block don’t match what’s in the DTL/config. See my attached pictures for reference.I’ve checked community threads like the one below, hence the edits I've made so far, but it doesn't work so I’m clearly missing something. https://community.ptc.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/how-to-change-default-tolerance-value-in-drawing/td-p/299696 Looking for the correct way to make this stick for all new drawings without m

I am getting error for programming could someone please help 

I have a number of relations based udfs for creating manifold block designs. All the logic is built using Relations in Creo-Parametric. There is a specific logic I have built around transferring dimensions in decimal form (say 3 decimal places) to a 3D hole-note written with relations, so that the hole note shows the 3 decimal places. (Usually, when transferring to string form, Relations only transfers the integer part of the dimension) I have a work around for this, which works well, but then, every such hole, has to have the logic built in its relations.  Is it possible to have this common logic as a subroutine, written in the part relations , which I can access, every time I want to increase the decimal places ? I can call this subroutine with the value, number of places I want to show so that the sub-routines returns a string value with the correct decimal places. This is the relations program for a counter bore dia with 2 decimal spaces and a counter bore depth with

Hi, I am currently trying to model a surfboard fin using a fin outline I found online and with an MH32 airfoil profile. I used points to make a datum curve for references to the boundary blend I made.I want to check that this geometry is okay or not as visually I can see at the top of the fin there looks like a misconnection between either blend surfaces, but I can't tell if it is just visual. I used mesh surface to see it looked weirdly shaped at the top and using the reflection you can see it reflect on the top too. Is there any way to fix this if this is the case, or is there a different way to do it with an asymmetric foil shape?Thank you,Joel 

I'm using Creo 12.4.0 When changing the "circ_interpolation" factor, arc_only seems to be broken: "Points Only" simulation does the cut correctly: "Arc only" simulation only does the lead-in and lead-out:This is for a trajectory toolpath.  But it also applies to thread milling.  The "Arc Only" path cuts the lead-in/lead-out only and doesn't cut around the part like it should.  Both appear correct in the toolpath display, but on the simulation (and in real life) the paths are broken. Toolpath Display for either setting: Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?  The workaround is to choose "points only", but this makes really huge gcode files.  And if I forget to change the setting, it can crash the tools.  

Anyone have success pointing Mathcad to the Anacona3 installation directory?   I have Anaconda Python.  Root environment is v3.11, but I have a personal v3.8 environment.  Both are supported by Mathcad Prime 11 for Advanced Controls.  My installation for Anaconda 3 is at:   C:\ProgramData\Anaconda3    Note: Anaconda doesn't like paths with spaces, so it installs in C:\ProgramData by default.  This directory contains python.exe, python3.dll and python311.dll.   I think this is the correct "Python installation folder" that I have set in Options.   I pointed the Mathcad Options item for the Python path to this directory.   Restarted Mathcad Prime 11.  It still can't find Python in my Custom Control script editor. Hopefully, someone out there has gotten this to work and can shed some light.

Dear Community I am using Creo 8.0.8.0. I would like to export or extract simulation results in a easy way into a csv-file or other file format that can be imported into excel. Currently I am facing following problem. I have done a Contact Analysis using 2 time step and I also wrote.In the post processing I created a graph using a measure (force) vs. time. Somehow I cannot export the graph. Also I cannot plot two measures (e.g. bolt force vs. input force) that shows their correlation over each time step. Somehow Creo creates several output-files and also folder of each time step but I am not able to find how to use this file and to extract the information I am interested in. Below you find a screenshot of the graph I would like to export into a CSV or other format.Within the post processing tool (Simulate Result) I was not able to export a CSV file. It was only possible to create a "rwd" file. Following I did:- Nonlinear (Contacts) simulation- Output: 6 Ma

Hello All, I am trying to simulate effect of wind load on glass railing holder which is fitted to ground via. screws. so after defining the constraints , contacts and loads when I review the results I observe that the glass holder penetrates into the ground. see attached screenshot.Can you please advise why is it so and how can it be resolved? I would appreciate your help with it.

It will be very helpfull to have ability to influence by check-box additional functionality in roun feature:- add side influence- piece to piece(like we already have in boundary blend feature) for example it is like this at the moment:but when both as suggested properties will be possible to get the result should be like this: 

Hi, Is there a way to rotate the dimension text by 180°? This is what I mean:Old:Rotated 180°: I saw someone suggest to rotate the view 180° in a previous post but this does not work for me. We are currently working with Creo 10. Kind regards,Jaime

Hi everyone,I wanted to share an issue I ran into while working on stress intensity factor () calculations in Mathcad, and see if anyone has advice on how to resolve it. When I calculated , Mathcad returned results with strange units: ΔK(a0) = 6.013×10^6 lb / (ft^0.5·s^2). That term in the denominator makes no sense — stress intensity factor units should be something like ksi√in (force / length^1.5), with no time dimensions.It seems that Mathcad is treating lb as pound-mass (lbm) instead of pound-force (lbf). Because of that, it introduces extra time units through when it tries to reconcile the dimensions. This appears to be why an is showing up in the denominator. Even after trying to redefine lb as lbf in my worksheet, Mathcad still seems to carry the time unit into the result. I can’t just delete the s^2 term — it keeps reappearing.Has anyone else run into this issue where Mathcad sneaks in an term when working with fracture mechanics equations? How do you properly set up your units

I have designed the schematics and assigned the color codes (e.g., BR, BL, BK, etc.). After exporting the XML file and importing it into Creo Parametric, everything appears as per the schematics, but the wire colors or cable details are not being reflected.Does anyone know why this happens and what the resolution might be?From what I understand, this could be related to the DMT file settings in the model. However, I’m not sure about the correct sequence or procedure to resolve this.If anyone has insights or the correct steps to fix this, please let me know

I have purchased a new computer because my old computer can not be updated to windows 11. I have Mathcad 14, #15, Mathcad Prime 3.1 on my old computer. I want to put them on my new computer and my question is whether I can copy the files to a usb drive and put them onto my new computer? Or cand is download the from and old download file? Or do I new to get a new download from PTC?Your assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Hello, I have a question about restricting the tool within the milling window in high-speed machining (HSM), similar to volume milling. I would be very thankful if someone could share any sample files of HSM. regardsAsif 

I have a huge library of existing parts and assemblies that were all created with the same start part and start assembly files. If I make a change to the start part or start assembly templates, will that have any effect on existing parts and assemblies, or will it only be applied to new parts or assemblies created after the template change?

see attached video for explanation if we redefine the assembly constraint from "by interface" to "manual", the message does not appear anymore in the above assembly.(view in My Videos) @CHENAMA @FF_11835266  

Hello,I'm having trouble with Creo View Adapters proe2pv.rcp settings. When assembly has multiple multibody parts all of them are published using one shape and same is for having multiple parts with flexibility.This should be easily fixed by changing conversion mode to full, but I end up with the same result no matter which conversion mode I select. Only way I can verify is when I choose Conversion Mode: Minimum Memory, I can see in log file waring as this function is deprecated."proe2pv Warning: Publishing job with deprecated option - Conversion Mode: Minimum Memory. This recipe option will be removed in a future release of Creo View Adapter." If I run in batch mode from command prompt I can see that output is only one *.ol file for each assembly component. Publish jobs are run from Windchill and worker is on separate server. We are using Creo 10.0.5.0 and Creo view adapters 11.0.0.0. Any Ideas why is that happening? Or what I'm doing wrong? /Girts

int CreateDrawingFromTemplate(){ProError status;ProMdl currMdl;ProMdlType mdl_type;ProMdlName mdlName;ProDrawing drawing;ProDwgcreateErrs errors;ProMdlnameShortdata solid_model_data;ProName predefined_template;ProName name;// Replace path with dummy placeholderFILE* mf_logfile = fopen("C:\\dummy_path\\dummy_project\\dummy_log.txt", "w");// Get current modelstatus = ProMdlCurrentGet(&currMdl);fprintf(mf_logfile, "ProMdlCurrentGet returned status: %d\n", status);if (status != PRO_TK_NO_ERROR) return status;// Get model typestatus = ProMdlTypeGet(currMdl, &mdl_type);fprintf(mf_logfile, "ProMdlTypeGet returned status: %d\n", status);if (status != PRO_TK_NO_ERROR) return status;// Get model namestatus = ProMdlMdlnameGet(currMdl, mdlName);fprintf(mf_logfile, "ProMdlMdlnameGet returned status: %d\n", status);if (status != PRO_TK_NO_ERROR) return status;// Fill solid model dataProUtilWstrcpy(solid_model_data.name, mdlName);switch (mdl_type) {case PRO_MDL_PART:ProStringToWstring(solid_m

I don't have a customer number or SCN, just a web account to manage my license.I have a version of Mathcad 14, I know it's old, but it works for what I do.My problem is reinstalling it on a new Windows 11 Laptop. It is on my Windows 10 Laptop but after a Windows update the operating system failed and is irreparable. The link I had to the Single User License is:https://support.ptc.com/appserver/lm/mathcad/call_logger/callLogger.jsp, and it worked but after entering the product code I get this error message:Invalid parameter values have been passed in. The application cannot continue. I couldn't log a case from that screen as well.   From what I'm reading MathCad license retrieval may no longer be supported.    I May have to abandon it and go to Smath Studio or some other program.

hello: I am relatively new to Mathcad and rusty on how matrices work within the program haha. I am trying to clamp a minimum value in a 5x1 vector in a spreadsheet i am generating for wind loads. I have a for loop  that generates a 5x1 vector for one variable  To which i use GCpnegzone4 5x1 to generate wind pressures in the following loop  Which works... however i need to clamp the values to a minimum of -16psf per code. meaning it should look like this:  the approach i have been using is taking the same for loop used for Pnegzone4 and adding a the min function in hopes that it will go by element and compare the min value and replace when necessary. However the code just reports the lowest value as show below:  Any help on how it should look like would be appreciated! my file is attached Thank you in advance!            

Just wondering if anyone has either gone through the Windows 10 to 11 upgrade while running Express 8.0 to see if it works, or has installed on a Windows 11 PC.Thanks