CAD

Hello,Recently I am getting a crashing issue when closing out the ECAD/MCAD Collaboration tool. The traceback file states "Exception EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION has occurred in the thread xxxxx". The thread number changes every time it crashes. I had another user try on a different machine and got the same result. This seems to have started within the last couple weeks, I have successfully done this process before this period. Thanks in advance for the support,Tanner

Recently was assigned a new laptop at work with a 4K, 120Hz screen. I have now found that whenever I unplug my laptop from the docking station (2 1080p 60Hz monitors), the visualizer in Creo freezes up and is unresponsive. I am still able to use the model tree/configuration ribbon, and opening new windows results works just fine. When reconnecting to the dock, all the windows start working again without issue. I have to assume this is something with my display settings. I have attempted to fix this issue by disabling Integrated Graphics and adjusting screen resolution and refresh rate, with no success. 

Hi folks, My problem is a simple one - calculate the vertical overburden stress in a soil mass.  The simplified equation is just [ unit weight of soil ] * [ depth ].  However, in a layered system with a different unit weight for each layer, the calculation is best formed as the sum of the vertical stress increments. To me that looks like a stepwise function constructed as a series of IF-ELSEIF-ELSE statements as shown in my example below.  It works but there is surely a more clever way. Lets say the bottom of layer 1 is z1 and the stress is p1, and the stress at some mid-depth in layer 2, say z2, is delta_p2, such that the stress at the point in question is p(z2) = p1 + delta_p2.  What is the most efficient way of structing that calculation as a function depth (z) so that it can be scaled to any number of layers.  My best idea so far is an "If" function to evaluate the stress at the bottom of each layer plus the portion of the n-th layer at the t

I have a matrix and would like to obtain the product of rowi+1/rowi How can I do it?

How can we share published MBD part to procurement teams who does not have Creo Parametric

Hi! I have a part with different holes. In my 2D drawing I am using the default hole table from Creo (v8.09). It shows for example M2.5x.45 ISO in the cell but when I look at the hole annotation, it shows M2.5x.45 ISO - H2.7 DRILL ( 2.700 ) THRU So why it doesn't show this in the hole table? I tried to change in the table the definition of the cell to include these information. Then I go back to the part and back again to the drawing and the cell content is back to what it was before. Why is that? Also I have a clearance hole on the part, but in the hole table it shows M2.5x.45 ISO. This is wrong.

I went from one broken PC to another, and I can't get a license on the new PC. I tried the website to obtain a license, and I got "you have reached the maximum number of licenses". I can't open a ticket because I don't have permission for an ID. What an absolute runaround. I will never recommend this product to my employer. Please fix this or give me my money back. I have wasted the last 3 hours.Charliecroy1@UAgrantham.eduMathcad Prime 11 Student EditionOne-time LicenseelectronicYour product key:

No se ha podido abrir el paquete de instalación. Póngase en contacto con el distribuidor de la aplicación para verificar si es un paquete de Windows Installer válido.

Hello,😁I am trying to implement Creo Schematics and Parametric for my university's Formula SAE team.Unfortunately I have issue loading the made .csv files back into Schematics.Initially the Datatable csv was fine but now with the Membermap updated, it no longer uploads into Schematics.Under the impression that the Type declared in the parameter of the wires I initially used was the issue, I tried to adjust the $$$datasettype$$$ value of the Datatable to different forms, referencing other wire types but this was not the issue still.I've attached the two Excel files I've put together to this message In hopes someone might understand where issues are arising. As well, here is a link to my original post in case that might be beneficial. I will be working on putting together a datatable set for the connectors (Mostly Deutsch) as to ensure that Creo will be set up far enough that auto-routing is possible even I don't manage to implement it for our Vehicle's CAD, this final semester of

Clicking setup.exe during Creo installation produces no response. How can I solve this?

As autocad. I have many 2D drawings, each drawing is a .DWR file. Is there any tool in the Drawing interface of Creo 12 to quickly combine many drawings into one DWR file? Thanks

I am using Mathcad Prime Release 10.0 and Datecode10.0.1.0I am trying to draw a contour plot for a publication paper. I drew the contour plot but when I export the plot to the paper after reduction to fit a double columns format paper the fonts of the contour plot axes and the legend font are too small and not readable. I tried many things and could not find a way to control the font size of the plot and legend. Need guide what to do.Here are the errors that I facedNo error message.

I was playing around with sorting and decided (yet again) that I was frustrated by some of the restrictions.  One thing led to another, and before I knew it, I was hip deep in ways to "improve" the lookup functions.    While contemplating Mathcad Zen Principles 3, 6, 7, 16, and 17, I wondered whether "unique" would be a worthwhile addition to the match/lookup modifiers.     Then my mind went blank when faced with how to handle NaNs.  In principle,  IEEE 754 NaNs are distinct.  And they would be if a standard Mathcad user had any way to distinguish between them, but they're harder to tell apart than Zathras and Zathras.  To the Mathcadder in the street, they might as well be indistinguishable, for all the good their distinctiveness does.   So, I've written two versions of unique to cater for both cases.   The question is which one would a user expect to be the default (and hence all lowercase) version?   I'v

Hi,Can someone show the method how can i get this space in between dimension line?How to break the dimension line to allow another line go through? CREO VERSION 9.0.6

We use PTC CREO for our engineering system, I am being told that we cannot export drawing to a directory in PDF format in part number order. Is it possible? 

I purchased the software - now how to i get the down load?So far the purchase experience is not good. Too complicated.

Hi everyone, I'm currently working with PTC Creo Web.Link and trying to determine whether it's possible to designate a parameter specifically associated with a FeatureID within an assembly context.I've reviewed the Web.Link documentation and found the method pfcScript.pwlParameterDesignationAdd(), which seems to apply only to general model parameters. However, I haven't found any reference to designating parameters that are tied directly to a FeatureID. Has anyone successfully designated a parameter linked to a specific feature within an assembly using Web.Link? If so, could you share any insights, approaches, or code examples?Any guidance would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance!

I am using Creo Parametric Release 7.0 and Datecode7.0.8.0Our team makes models (assemblies to be precise) of chips/substrates that have a rectangular body, an overlay showing bump circles, and hundreds to thousands of solder ball models patterned over the bump circles that were imported from dwg onto the model's surface. The pattern part is currently tricky and involves a lot of file conversions and scripting outside of Creo to make a pattern table that meets the formatting required. I wanted to see if there is a way (or request this feature) to be able to pattern each solder ball over each bump circle by recognizing the pattern of bump circles. I know there is a feature recognition of patterns and ability to write/read that pattern table, but it does not recognize lines, only edges/surfaces of holes. The ability to recognize the edge of an imported circle for this feature recognition functionality would allow us to save multiple steps.

I am using Creo Parametric Release 7.0 and Datecode7.0.8.0I'm working with Creo Parametric 7.0 and preparing a model for FEM meshing in Altair SimLab. I need to divide a surface on the model to isolate a specific region for mesh control. In Creo 9.0, I know there's a "Divide Surface" feature that makes this easy, but it's not available in version 7.0.I’ve tried using the Split Surface tool, but it doesn’t allow me to sketch and limit the division to a specific area. What I need is a way to sketch a region on an existing surface and divide it so that SimLab can recognize it as a separate surface during import.In CATIA, I would use the "Sew Surface" function to achieve this, and SimLab would correctly identify the separated surface. Is there a workaround or alternative method in Creo 7.0 to achieve similar functionality?Any guidance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

I can't seem to create a scatter plot using a Chart Component.   Is there a way to do this?   

Is there a way to re-read Excel Data that has been imported into PTC Mathcad using READEXCEL? At the moment the only way I know how to re-read the Excel data is to delete the following and re-import:  

Hello, I have a ME10 macro that selects all geometries from a view and returns the pointer and geometry properties as a list to LISP.The pointer corresponds to the return value of the sd-get-annotator-reference function.To continue working with the elements, I need the sel_items for the pointers. But I can't find an inverse function for sd-get-annotator-reference.So far I have implemented this by using get_selection in LISP to get all sel_items and building a new list in which the pointers are added using sd-get-annotator-reference.I then use this list to add the sel_items to the list returned by ME10. However, the last process is quite slow.Does anyone have an idea how to do this efficiently?BR

I want to learn Creo parameter and Relations for 2d drawing. please suggest me best tutorial for that. I am using Creo 10. Thank you.

We would like to have three additional fields added in Creo NC for the tool type “Reaming”: “tip angle”, “tip offset”, and “tip diameter”. "Picture 1 Reaming" Our colleagues in programming would like to control the depth during programming—similar to “Drilling” and “Thread Cutting”—using these additional fields.This would be a considerable relief during programming, as the chamfer/lead-in of the reamer would no longer need to be added to the depth manually. Example for Drilling:"Picture 2 Drilling" Example for Thread Cutting:"Picture 3 Thread cutting"    

Hi Everyone,I'm encountering a challenge while attempting static structural simulations in Creo Simulate using Mid Surface shell idealization with contact definitions.It appears that the contact interactions are being ignored during the solution process, leading to premature termination of the simulation. This issue seems specific to the shell idealization approach.While switching to solid or thin solid idealizations does allow the contacts to be recognized, it significantly increases model complexity and computational time.Has anyone faced a similar issue or found a workaround for this? Any suggestions or insights would be greatly appreciated.Thanks in advance!