Creo+ and Creo Parametric

Whether it is able to do Cleanup Dimensions for the entire drawing sheet in Creo 10 via J-Link?

I’m testing out a multibody part design workflow.Everything seems to work well except for the link to the source model.If the source model is moved or renamed, the child models regenerate but I can’t find a way to reestablish the link. Any suggestions?My workflow.Create multibody part. Import the multibody part into a new (empty part) using inheritance. This brings in solid bodies and datums. Do “keep bodies” to keep just the single body that is necessary. Repeat for other bodies. Close parent and child parts, erase from session. Rename or move parent part. Open one of the child parts and try to re-link.

Hey there! I have been using Creo 11 for the longest time and have always been able to get 2D Drawings into a PDF file easily via Export function. Two months ago I upgraded to Creo 12 and created a big assembly. When I tried to export the 2D Drawings I had created, I found that the export to PDF does not work for whatever reason (tried via “Menu - Save As - Export” & “Quick Export”, as well as “Save as” and select PDF in the popup window). The weird part is, that it opens the dialogue window where I can select a location to save the file and I can enter a name, but when I click Save, it does not create any file. Also there is no Message or warning displayed anywhere which could lead me to the cause… Just in case: I know that I can use Print to PDF, but unfortuneately the plot quality is way worse and for this assembly specifically I need an A2 format which is not supported by print to PDF. I have also tried all AI Assistants but none of their tricks worked. I have done many workaro

I'm hoping someone has come across this before because I'm running out of ideas.My setupMacBook Pro M4 Parallels Desktop Windows 11 Creo Parametric Education Edition 11.0.5.0Issue 1 – Hidden Line Views in DrawingsWhen I create a drawing, all views display correctly in No Hidden or Shaded mode.However, as soon as I change any drawing view to Hidden Line, the hidden lines are completely incorrect. Instead of showing normal hidden geometry, they all radiate from a single point, producing a starburst effect.This happens with:Top view Front view Side view Projected views General viewsSo it doesn't seem to be related to a particular drawing view or orientation.I've attached screenshots comparing my result with the expected result from the course lecturer.Issue 2 – Facet / Triangle LinesAfter creating the first feature (hole, round, chamfer, etc.), the model starts displaying triangular/facet lines across the model.The geometry is correct and the model regenerates successfully, but the displa

After recently upgradeing to Creo11 from Creo7, we came across a strnage conflict where our mapkey $F2 works in drawing mode but not in Modeling mode...sometimes. As it turns out, if the layer tree is open in the model, the $F2 mapkey will not work but if it is collapsed or closed it will work.  Drawing mode is unaffected by the display of the layer tree. I understnad that everywhere in Windows and many windows programs that $F2 is for rename.  I am not sure though why Creo does not unbind this, even after the Creo dialog pops up asking the user if they want to use the key for a mapkey or for a Creo Shortcut. Even after choosing mapkey, it still is depending on if the model layer tree is open, and if you click on a layer and press F2 it will rename that layer.  I opened Creo7 and verified that it did not work this way in Creo4, regardless of layer tree display status. For a moment I thought it would be a workaround to add a collapse layer tree to the mapkey before running but of course

Antriebswelle von Rasenmähroboter

Hello everyone, I have 2 parameters, and i want that when those parameters are in certain value the system pop up a message that say something like “parameter 1 is… and 2 is … “. Like for example: i have a material and a treatment. Not every treatment can be execute on every material. Fe i choose a quench on titanium. The thermal treatment is not possible or available on such material. A message should appear with “you choose this and this, please check”. FE when i am check in the part. So i want to do an initial confrontation of the 2 parameter. FE the material and the treatment. And where i will do this? I don’t want a real relation. But only a check. I read about the model check. How can i use it for this purpose? I hope i explain it clearly. Thank you 

I am facing an issue in Creo Simulate 9.0 while performing a Random Response Analysis on a large assembly. The modal analysis runs successfully up to 2000 Hz and extracts approximately 250 mode shapes from a mesh containing around 280,000 elements. However, when I proceed with the Random Response Analysis using these modal results, the solver fails with the status "Run Failed". No specific error messages are reported in the log files, making it difficult to identify the root cause. The analysis is being run on a high-end workstation with 256 GB RAM and ample local disk storage, so system resources do not appear to be a limitation.What is interesting is that the Random Response Analysis completes successfully when limited to only a few modes (for example, the first 6 modes). Has anyone experienced a similar issue with large models or high mode counts in Creo Simulate? Are there any known limitations, solver settings, memory requirements, or additional diagnostic logs that I should inves

Is it possible to use the home use license with an extension? We have Creo design advanced professional licenses, but cannot use the manufacturing extensions for home use. Myself and other employees have hobbyist CNC machines and were curious if we could purchase a CAM extension to use with the home license?

Tried to research this and found other posts but no results listed.  Using CREO Parametric 10.0.4.0In an assembly, I have 10+ components assembled and always try to fully define the constraints.  As I am adding additional components and constraints towards the end of the design (hardware) I start getting "Confirm Package Reference" which to me indicates another assembly component is not fully defined.  I can click "Use Ref" and move on but want to resolve the unconstrained component that I am assembling new parts to. Looking back at the assembly tree, I see component #10 has a small box indicating it is not fully constrained.  I click to edit constraints, and the Set Status says "partially constrained".  Yet I have three constraints (coincident/distance/distance) that should fully constrain the part/subassembly.  So I uncheck "Set Enabled" and create a new set.  Using similar constraints, I get the status to read "Fully Constrained". Close out th

Hello everyone!I am trying to create a pin constraint regarding the rotor of an electric motor. As expected I want it to only rotate around itself. I am attaching the pin constraint I have set and I can’t find the issue with it…Any help is really appreciated!This picture shows the axis alignment. This picture shows the translation 

I have a large number of files .prt and .asm that have a custom unit system. How can i change the name of custom unit system massively for all files?example:unit_system_BRAVO --→ must became -→   unit_system_CHARLIE Thank you in advance for who wants to help meGianni

I'm getting an error when running tasks in CREO: ERROR CODE:3 (SUBCODE7). I've already contacted NVIDIA; we've updated the driver, rolled back to older versions, and tweaked the graphics card settings, but the error keeps coming back. The card is a Quadro P400.   

I have Nonconformance Object, I need to get Nonconformance Review from Nonconformance object.Is there any api to get Nc Review or navigate Api will work.

Is there any API to bring Nonconformance Review from Nonconformance?

during the import of a STEP file. After opening the STEP file and confirming the import as an assembly, some of the imported components is not correctly recognized: the square icon, which indicates that the component's constraints or degrees of freedom have been correctly identified, does not appear in the Component Tree. By opening the Edit Constraint Definition dialog and simply clicking OK, without making any changes, the system immediately updates the component status and the square icon appears in the Component Tree. This behavior demonstrates that the recognition of constraints (or degrees of freedom) is not performed automatically during the import process, but only after a manual user action. We therefore request that, once a STEP file import is completed, the software automatically recognize and update the constraints for all imported components, eliminating the need to manually confirm each individual component.

We just recently switch from Creo 9 (because of end of life) to Creo 12 and are having major problems when importing sheets from other Creo drawings into a new Creo drawing.  Continue to get random errors, but the most common error is "Unable to merge. Target drawing contains incompatible elements. Please contact Technical Support." Never had any problems with Creo 9.  I can open a Creo 9 drawing in Creo 9 and import sheets without any issue.  Open the same drawing in Creo 12 and try to imports sheets and after 2 or 3 sheets it starts throwing error messages and will not import any more sheets. Anyone else have this issue? Contacted PTC support over a month ago and still no answer. Thanks

FYI - New FREE Automation Workbooks available on GitHub:https://github.com/SimplifiedLogic/Nitro-CELL-FREE_AUTOMATIONSYou can download and use with Nitro-CELL (FREE or Purchased License Users) to help automate the batch generations/exports.  They are normal Excel Workbooks that Nitro-CELL can use directly. BATCH_CREATE_DRAWINGS.xlsxUse Case: Assume you have been working on a design (following corporate standards of course) and need to generate the Drawings quickly.  You have Drawing Templates setup/configured - and dred the manual process before you to get those made.  What this automation does: This automation can grab your parts and assemblies in-session and automatically create the Drawings using your Drawing Template - leaving them in-session. 😎    BATCH_INST_TO_ITEMS.xlsxUse Case: Assume you have hit a bit of a wall with Family Table Instances - and you want them to be independent models instead of dragging the generic model around all over the place.  Or you want to use Family T

Whoa! - CREOSON has hit over 13,000+ downloads! 🤠Interest in Creo Parametric Automation is accelerating… many creative users and companies out there leveraging CREOSON to streamline their Creo Parametric workflows. 🕺🏽100% Open Source! Uses JLINK as interface to Creo Kernel! Simple JSON transaction interface! Works with ANY Language! (e.g. Python, JavaScript, etc.) User friendly / Intuitive Commands! Local or Remote via HTTP protocol! Shockingly easy to integrate with AI! (Claude AI via MCP works! - videos on site)Learn more —>  https://creoson.comEnjoy! Ps.  We are working on Creo 13 Support! Dave

Check out this video on Creo Reverse Engineering from PTC Application EngineersPresenters: Lino Tozzi (Technical Specialist, Fellow) and Tom Quaglia (Creo Segment Sales).Original Date Presented: January 27, 2022 

For WWGM and Creo, We are updating vulnerability batch update as per document “Creo WWGM CEF Patch Table” , What about WGM 13.1.2.2.version? vulnerability batch update not required this version(WWGM 13.1.2.2) ?, Please update us

I'm using Creo 10 to compare two versions of a supplier assembly by placing both into a top-level compare assembly:BATMAN0000.ASM— baseline BATMAN0000_30JUN26.ASM — updated supplier version (they use Creo 4)Issues I'm seeing: The dated sub-assembly is significantly offset and rotated — the two do not overlap at all, even when using a Default constraint. Status bar reads: "Place using a component interface." Notification Centre showing multiple errors: Regeneration Failed Circular References Reference Model Failed Model is Disconnected "WARNING: Cannot update placement of component" Both sub-assemblies have an ASM_DEF_CSYS defined, but the placement still fails to align them correctly.My questions:Is this likely a coordinate system origin mismatch from the supplier? How do I force correct CSYS-to-CSYS alignment between the two versions? Is Creo's built-in Tools → Model Compare a better approach for this use case than a manual compare assembly?Any advice appreciated. Thanks!

I want to add a reference symbol to a dimension annotation on the view in the engineering drawing, but I'm not sure what the correct way to do it is.  ProSelection sel_dim = NULL; ProError err = ProSelectionAlloc(NULL, (ProModelitem*)&dim, &sel_dim); if (err != PRO_TK_NO_ERROR) {     return; } ProSetDatumTag datum; err = ProMdlSetdatumtagCreate((ProMdl)drawing, sel_dim, NULL, L"A", &datum); if (err == PRO_TK_NO_ERROR)  {     ProAnnotationShow((ProAnnotation*)&datum, NULL, RightView);     ProWindowRepaint(PRO_VALUE_UNUSED); } ProSelectionFree(&sel_dim);

I am working with Family tables and repeat regions, i know that adding the [.1] i can changes my family tables decimals but it seems like i can´t access to that panel to update them.Are there any solution for this??? or am i missing something??? 

I am using Creo Parametric Release 12.4 and Datecode12.4.3.0 I am building a parametric model derived from an anatomical scan of the lower leg to generate a custom orthosis, with the goal of regenerating the model when the input scan changes. To define a specific point on a curve within this model, I am using a feasibility study in the BMX (Behavioral Modeling) module. The study runs successfully and returns a feasible solution, but the checkbox to save the study as a feature in the model tree remains grayed out and cannot be selected. I have successfully saved a similar feasibility study as a model tree feature in the same model previously, using the same approach, so I do not believe this is a configuration issue. The behavior appears to be specific to this study. Software version: Creo Parametric [12.4.3.0] OS: Windows 11 Could you advise on what conditions must be met for the "save to model tree" option to become active, and why it might be grayed out despite a successful feasib