Creo+ and Creo Parametric

We’ve headed to Sion in Switzerland to meet H55, a Swiss company pioneering electric propulsion systems for aircraft, from energy storage to battery management. Founded in 2017, they operate across Switzerland, Canada, and France and have a vision for a cleaner, quieter, more efficient aviation industry.    

This one has had me confused for about a month so I am turning to the Community. PTC Tech Support call  was opened on March 21 and nothing back to help. Instead of the usual "Can we do a Teams session?', the support engineer replied that he had sent the issue to R&D. We run Creo from a single install on a network server, have since Wildfire 4 days. Procedure is to the install on a Windchill server, which doubles as the Publishing machine for CreoView, and then copy the install folder over to the network drive and edit the parameteric.bat file to change the file location. This has worked great. Wehn the CreoAgent program came into play, we do the same thing, using an environment variable in a start batch file that we call from parametric.bat. This has worked through Creo 4, Creo 7, Creo 9 and somewhat in Creo 11.  I have 2 sets of Windchill/Creo servers and one is air-gapped due to data security reasons. When I installed Creo 11 on that server, did the copy and edited the

Hii have trail file .It  work perfect if i have only one component  whit same name in  assembly . if i have two or more dosnt work.How to change that this will be work. . Thanks TP.

Creo 7+   I have a need to predefine in a drawing template the display of a quilt in some views in the template. We are currently using view specific layer display settings to manually set this up on views after using the template to create a new drawing. I am looking for a way to define this in the template views to avoid this manual work on all drawings using the template.   See this related thread specific to the use of layers: Drawing template layers: possible to define layers... - PTC Community   A combination state can control a layer state which can then be set in a drawing template view, I tried using this for a view and it works, however the view display does not propagate to projected views (works to spec according to PTC).  See: Article - CS432910 - Layer status is changed for a Projected View of a combined state of drawing in Creo Parametric   A combination state would have to be created in a model for each view orientation (16x) in the d

I am using Creo Parametric Release 5.0 and Datecode5.0.4.0Having issue in Search path file, not able to read from folders path provided.

I have an issue with connectors that moved off the harness in the flat state. I actually have several like this. These were done by an outside firm and handed off to me to make changes. In the Model tree in the flat all the ones that are out in space are all highlighted in RED as Regeneration Failed features. I also have some features in the model tree that have failed as well but are fine in the main harness assembly. 

Hi all, I have been trying to create a library of parts for our company to use via Windchill. I have created all the parts via the instance creator and they all generated correctly and worked with the IFX tool when the files were local.  I then uploaded the files for all the components onto Windchill and it worked fine for a week or so. However, I have now run into an issue where the button head fasteners and nuts don't assemble via the tool for an unknown issue.  Looking into the error note it says the placement references are failing to work properly but I can't find anything different in the .dat files compared to other fastener files which are still working as intended.  They can be assembled manually from their location on Windchill so the parts work, just seem to fail when trying to use them with IFX.  I've attached the fastener .dat files used below on Creo 8.0. Please let me know if there is a fix to get those files working as t

I solved this myself but it was by pure accident. My section view was showing cosmetic threads and i couldnt' figure out why.  i would recreate the section view and it would still show them.  Not every section view shows cosmetic threads, only a certain one. What i learned was that if you have an EXCLUDED COMPONENT in the Hatch Bodies then it will show the cosmetic threads in that cross section(despite not being on that plane).  I had to turn off my excluded body and then the cosmetic threads would disappear.  What made this harder to understand was that if you have a partial view of the view you're using and that EXCLUDED BODY isn't in the actual splined area then you don't get the option to TURN ON the EXCLUDED COMPONENT.  I had to undo my partial view, make the exlcluded componented INCLUDED and then re-do my partial view. just an FYI since my google-fu turned up nothing on this.   Bug Report?

How to have Cable with different Spools in a Harness?See Image attached. Green and Yellow need different spools. Spool option to change is grayed out for YELLOW. If changed for GREEN, Yellow also changes. THANKS! 

Hi,   There is an issue reported from customer by creating assembly constraint connecting 2 holes which is not parallel. The same assembly is already manufactured by customer with no 3d model drawing references. Now the same assembly is created in Creo but unable to apply the constraints. Along with this they are unable to simulate the same for static analysis as there are gaps which customer is using for creating welding. Kindly help me with a proper solution.   Thanks Naresh  

I am working in Creo 10 Cabling of which I am still in the early learning phases. I am able to route multiple cables in my assemblies but now I'd like to know if it is possible to create generic Wire Looms that would surround them along their paths. I would prefer to create this before any routing so that I could use it to follow its route when creating new cables in my harness. Is this actually done in "Sheathing" in the new cable routing window option or maybe as a spool and if in a spool, how do I enter the ID diameter as well as the wall thickness?  Thank you.

Need help in simulating the internal, external gear pair. And the gear-2 here will move horizontally and engage with gear-1. Also, gear-2 should start rotating after teeth engagement with gear-1. I am interested in dynamic simulation in this case. Is this possible in Creo Mechanism MDO? Thanks for your help! 

Is it possible to have more than 1 custom system color scheme in Creo Parametric 10.0.7.0  . This seems as though it would be simple. We are all well aware that there are, by default, six choices for the "system color scheme" As far as I can tell there is just one called custom. Can I add another custom scheme? This is so different than the "appearance manager" where there are often a bewildering selection of colors for the models.

Hello everyone, I would like some advice on choosing the best PC to use with CREO? Specifically, I would like to know, in summary: 1. Is a good CPU or a powerful VIDEO CARD more influential?2. When choosing a CPU, however, what is more important:a. The CPU Architecture (e.g. XEON, i* series, etc.) orb. The CPU Frequency3. When choosing a VIDEO CARD what is more important:a. The VIDEO CARD seriesor The VIDEO CARD GPU Frequencyor The VIDEO CARD GPU Memory TyMatteo

🙂 PTC should have a bug fix on this. Not a bug I guess, but would be so enjoyable to navigate flawlessly. OK! to the point: Once the drop down - select option (Check box) - I have to click out side for it to go. - I would recommend PTC to do the same with scroll function. Scroll does not work when the window dropdown is showing. It is a small thing but annoys me 50 times minimum in a day. This a great example about how a smallest thing can ruin for overall passion and productivity. WHAT CAN BE DONE?  Thank for taking your time to read and pl let me know your thoughts. GO CREO!

Hi,I am trying to create planer bend in Sheetmetal part in Creo.In  Planer Bend Thickness is different than real thickness, how to use Bendtable feature to apply Bend allowance ?I tried with basic bend table to planer bend feature , Flat length is not changing. Anyone knows how to use this Planer bend feature and get correct flat length.

We are trying to use Creo performance advisor , but information from the machine is not arriving on the panel , we have already unblocked the Firewall and antivirus , we did a telnet test as shown in the following print , and I also put the site https://apps.ptc.com in the browser and the error Http/1.1 Service Unavailable appeared , would I need to do anything else for this CREO to appear on the panel ? I'm running Version 8.4

Initially posted in this topic   Hi,   I know this topic is becoming old, but is there any method/solution yet on how to accomplish more complex routing of a cable with more routing points? My use case is 3 off cables same part number, terminated in one end to a motor, other end needs to be terminated to different locations, depending on the design of upper level assembly   Regards Yngve 

Is it possible to select multiple CAD models within the file open dialog of PTC Creo to open multiple models in one operation?I'm only able to select one model at a time.Is there perhaps another way to accomplish the same thing? Thank you very much in advance for any advice.

I have 1 user who is only getting a black background in Creo 11.0.3.0. We just upgraded last Friday from Creo 9. His colors were fine in Creo 9. We have removed his local config.pro and creo_parametic_customization.ui files and restarted Creo 11 and still just a black background. Even trying different Creo color themes (Dark or Light) do not change his display. The Creo 11 install is on a network drive and everyone uses the same start up files.  Anyone have any suggestions on what else may be causing this issue. There are at least 4 others on Creo 11 without any issues.

Hello everyone,We are working with Creo using a floatting licence. The users are not on the same site, we do not have a cloud because we are sensitive to the professionnal data protection. As a consequence, we share data with our Nas synology with VPN acces. To make the floatting licence available for all users we would like to create a container with container manager on the Nas to run flexnet licence manager. As of today, I couldn't fine any data to manage it. I am looking for a docker_compose.yml file and for la flexnet image that works for Creo.Does any of you already set up a such configuration ? if yes, could you please send me your files and process ?Thank you very much !Alexia 

Hi,How do I get the final shape in the attached picture? I want to "weld" the edges together. For me it's irrelevant if it's done in sheetmetal, by surfaces or any other method. All I want is the finished shape and sheetmetal is maybe a way to go. The only thing I know is the dimensions when the panels are flat. The finished height of the container will be less than the length of the panels due to the curvature. Fist time here and hoping for some tips 🙂 BRRobert

Hello Everyone,   I'm planning to upgrade Creo 11, I noticed some config option are depreciated in Creo parametric 11 from my existing config.pro file.may  I know the new config option for below ones.   dim_tol_lead_trail_zeros Gtol_lead_trail_zeros lead_trail_zeros Mapkey(continued) Pro_texture_library Windows_browser_type Thank you Kumar  

Hi all, Looking for a bit of guidance on annotations, but my desired outcome may not be possible from the research I've done already. I am working on an assembly and want to include an annotation for our own reference while designing. I was aiming to have an attached leader note with the text following the screen, rather than being placed on a plane, so it was more legible when working within the assembly. I have a legacy model from a much older version of Creo/ProE where this behaviour was achieved. Pictures below showing the text of the leader note scaling with the view's zoom level, and rotating to always face the screen. The leader and elbow are fixed in 3D space, but the text is dynamic.  The closest I have achieved in Creo8 is an item attached note, but this can be blocked by the model, whereas the legacy note always displays on top. I am guessing there have just been updates in the way the annotations work, and there is now no way to replicate this